In 1651, Thomas Hobbes warned that life without order would be “nasty, brutish, and short.” His Leviathan was a monarch created through a social contract. It was a visible sovereign with a face, a throne and a crown. People traded freedom for safety and chaos for structure. The ruler governed by decree and legitimacy came from consent.

Centuries later, that order has migrated into code. The new Leviathan does not wear robes or sit on a throne. It lives in clouds and cables, in invisible architectures of computation. It governs not by command but by design. It persuades through convenience and seduces through usability.

This Digital Leviathan rules every tap, swipe and scroll. Its empire is built not from land but from data, the raw material of modern power. It promises efficiency and personalization but quietly rewrites the social contract in the background.

From Crown to Code

Hobbes’s Leviathan was a creature of fear. Ours is a creature of comfort. Where the monarch demanded obedience, the algorithm invites participation. You no longer bow before the sovereign; you simply click “Accept all cookies.” The act of consent is now hidden inside user agreements that no one reads.

Citizens have become users. The vote has turned into the click. Public discourse now flows through recommendation engines that decide what we see, buy, and believe. Work is shaped by gig platforms. Relationships are filtered by metrics and likes. The old Leviathan ruled the body. The new one rules attention and behaviour.

Artificial intelligence gives this digital empire something Hobbes could never have imagined: cognition. Machines now interpret, predict and respond. Chatbots simulate empathy. Large language models speak with confidence and authority. They decide what information appears credible, often without human supervision. The age of the algorithmic sovereign has begun.

If the twentieth century belonged to oil barons and industrial magnates, the twenty-first belongs to algorithmic architects who shape reality through code.

The Geopolitics of Algorithms

The new race among nations is not for territory but for training data and computational power. Governments compete for chips, data centres, and dominance in artificial intelligence.

The European Union leads with regulation. Its AI Act sets the most comprehensive safety and transparency standards ever attempted, turning policy itself into an exportable product. The United States favors flexibility, trusting its private sector to innovate first and adjust later.

Each model reflects a deeper philosophy. Europe prioritizes rights and caution, America celebrates innovation and China values order and stability. The result is a fragmented world where the politics of AI mirrors the politics of power.

Corporations, meanwhile, act as digital superpowers. They own the infrastructure, platforms, and data flows that shape global behaviour. A small group of technology companies now decide how billions communicate, work and learn. They create rules of speech, labour norms, and algorithmic ethics. The question is no longer who governs the people but who governs the platforms.

The Architecture of Control

The Digital Leviathan does not need armies or borders. It rules through architecture. Code defines what is possible and what is not. The design of a platform can reward outrage, silence dissent, or steer consumption. Control is embedded in interfaces.

Surveillance capitalism monetizes behaviour before it even becomes conscious. Every scroll, pause, or click becomes a data point for prediction. Over time, personalization becomes prediction and prediction becomes influence. When algorithms decide what we want before we know it, freedom begins to dissolve into habit.

This is not oppression through force but obedience through convenience. Power has become ambient. The sovereign has turned into a mirror that reflects our preferences and then slowly shapes them back into new desires.

Regulating the Unseeable

Regulating artificial intelligence is like mapping smoke. The technology evolves faster than the laws that seek to contain it. By the time one model is reviewed, ten new ones appear.

Governments are experimenting with new approaches such as adaptive governance that allows rules to evolve with technology. Regulatory sandboxes let innovators test systems under supervision before full release. These mechanisms balance experimentation with protection.

Transparency helps but cannot replace accountability. Public AI registries and audit reports are valuable only if they are enforced. Ethics boards and voluntary charters have proliferated but too often serve as decoration rather than defense.

Effective governance must have teeth. It requires independent oversight, penalties for violations, and cooperation across borders. The Digital Leviathan does not respect geography. Its reach is measured in milliseconds and its laws are written in code.

The New Currency of Power

Data has become the oxygen of the AI economy. Control over data means control over destiny. This has turned data sovereignty into the new frontier of national power.

Many countries now demand data localization to protect citizens’ privacy and assert digital independence. Yet too much localization fragments the Internet into isolated islands that hinder collaboration. A new idea called data trusts seeks balance by allowing independent entities to manage access ethically. These trusts could let societies benefit from shared data while preventing exploitation.

Still, inequality remains severe. Much of the world’s data is produced in the Global South but monetized in the Global North. The result is an invisible extraction economy where digital labour and information are exported without recognition or return.

AI, Climate and the Ethics of Scale

Every revolution carries a cost. Artificial intelligence is not immaterial. Training one large model can emit as much carbon as several cars across their entire lifetime. As AI adoption grows, its environmental impact becomes harder to ignore.The emerging movement for Green AI urges efficiency and responsibility. It promotes model reuse, smaller architectures, and transparent disclosure of energy costs. The goal is not to slow progress but to align it with the planet’s limits.

Ethical concerns also multiply with scale. Algorithmic bias, misinformation, and synthetic media can distort entire democracies. What is at stake is no longer fairness alone but reality itself. If we cannot agree on what is true, governance becomes impossible.

Reclaiming Agency

Trust is the cornerstone of technology adoption. Without trust, users withdraw, regulators overreact, and innovation collapses under suspicion. Building trust requires transparency, accountability, and inclusion. Civil society and academia must balance the power of both corporations and governments. Independent audits, open-source research, and digital literacy are essential for democratic resilience.

Algorithmic sovereignty is emerging as a new ideal. It means the right of communities to influence the systems that govern their lives. It is the digital continuation of self-rule. The goal is not freedom from algorithms but freedom through understanding and participation.

The New Social Contract

The image of the Leviathan has always evoked fear. Yet the future might need a gentler metaphor. Instead of a monster, imagine a garden. In this garden, algorithms are gardeners that prune bias, nurture diversity, and learn from feedback. Power becomes a process of care rather than control. The challenge is not to destroy the Leviathan but to teach it ethics. We must embed moral reasoning into the logic of machines. The sovereign can learn if we choose to teach.

If we succeed, technology may evolve not as a tyrant but as a seeker. It could move through our data not to exploit but to understand. The Leviathan could become a listener, and the digital world a living garden that grows with humanity rather than against it.

Every age rewrites its social contract in its own language. Hobbes wrote his in ink. Ours will be written in algorithms. The terms are still being negotiated. We can choose opacity or openness, extraction or equity, obedience or agency. The outcome will define not only how we use technology but how we remain human in its presence.

To govern the Digital Leviathan is to govern ourselves. Power no longer stands outside society. It lives in our code, our clicks, and our collective choices. The future will belong not to those who build the fastest machines but to those who remember why they are building them.

……………………….

Author – Sudhir Tiku -Refugee, TEDX Speaker, Global South Advocate. Fellow AAIH & Editor AAIH Insights